home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ The Supreme Court / The Supreme Court.iso / pc / briefs / 1992 / 92_1750 / 1750p051.tif (.png) < prev    next >
Tagged Image File Format  |  1995-08-30  |  71KB  |  1696x2200
Labels: book | reckoner | sky
OCR: 1976 (currently codified at 42 U.S.C 1988) which has legislative history that expressly recognizes and supports double standard ir fee awards prevailing plaintiffs and prevailing defendants. The Lieb court reiected this argument holding that "[s]ubstantially different policy considerations are present; moreover, tr the reenactment of the Copyright Act that same year, 1976. Congress did you TeFet double standard Lieb, supra, 788 F.2d a1 155 In rejecting this analogy between dilferent attorney' fee statutes, the Lieh court also stated, The public poli- cies to be subserved by the sanction 10 awarding counse fees vary from Field to field Unless cognate policies are to be enforced the decisions ir one field would not pe valid analogies to another. (quoting Cloth Hyman. 46 F.Supp 185, 192 T 195 ...